HydrogenCHP

Electricity is the easy part. Most industrial sites have a credible path to lower emissions electricity, whether through the grid decarbonising, on site solar, or contracting. Heat is harder, and it is frequently the larger share of a site's emissions. Processes needing steam or high temperature heat cannot simply be plugged in. Hydrogen CHP appears in most conversations about this, and it is one option among several. Here is how the realistic options compare for an Australian industrial site making decisions now. First: know your heat demand properly Before comparing technologies, characterise what you actually need. The answer narrows the field immediately. What temperature? Low temperature hot water, medium temperature, or high temperature steam. This is the single biggest determinant of what is feasible. What quantity, and when? Continuous or batch, and the load profile through the day and year. How is it delivered? Direct fired, steam, hot water, thermal oil. How firm is t...

Burning biogas on site to make power and heat is the established path, and for a lot of sites it is the right one. There is a second option that changes the economics entirely: rather than converting the gas to electricity, clean it up until it is indistinguishable from natural gas, and sell it as gas. A biomethane plant does that. It is a fundamentally different business model to cogeneration, and whether it suits depends far more on your commercial position than on your engineering. Biogas and biomethane are not the same thing Worth being precise, because the terms get used interchangeably and they are not. Biogas is what comes out of a digester or a landfill. Methane diluted with carbon dioxide, plus water vapour, hydrogen sulphide and various trace contaminants. Combustible, but nowhere near the specification of pipeline gas. Biomethane , sometimes called renewable natural gas, is biogas that has been upgraded: the carbon dioxide removed, the contaminants stripped, the moisture t...